With the top computer vision conferences now mentioning the top reviewers, I was wondering what the statistics for CVPR / ICCV / ECCV look like (from 2017 until now). Please find the list of top reviewers below, this could for example be a good tool to find students that would be promising candidates for an internship.

If someone does not show up in this list, does it mean that they are not a good reviewer? No, for various reasons. For example, some may not review papers because they have other duties, like serving as an area chair. Furthermore, there are also some that write great reviews but their area chair may not mark them as such so they are unfortunately not getting recognized for it.

Did you spot a mistake? Please don't hesitate to reach out to me, I would love to correct them. A good way of determining the origin of errors is to look at the source spreadsheet linked at the top. The statistics were last updated after ICCV 2025, I will try to keep it up to date for the foreseeable future.